WAW – Methodology

Research Design
The Women at Work Study (WAW) targeted women aged 40 years and over, in academic, administrative and executive level roles at three Australian Universities. Data were collected via an online survey over a two-month period, between November 2013 and January 2014. The study was promoted through the Universities’ communication channels, including all-staff emails and advertisements on staff intranet homepages. A click through link to the online survey was provided. The online survey included questions relating to health and lifestyle; well-being; menstrual status and menopause-related symptoms; employment conditions; job characteristics and work outcomes. The survey included widely used and well-validated scales to assess women’s health (e.g. SF-12v2, Maruish, 2012) and women’s enjoyment and engagement at work (e.g. work engagement, Schaufeli et al., 2006; and job satisfaction, Cammann et al., 1983).  The project was approved by the ethics committees of all institutions involved.

The Women at Work survey was completed by 839 female university employees aged 40 years and over, who were employed as academic, administrative or executive level staff:

  • Uni A (421) 18.9% of the known population of female staff aged 40+;
  • Uni B (259) 6.7% of the known population of female staff aged 40+; and
  • Uni C (159) 17.2% of the known population of female staff aged 40+.

The percentage of participants in each position type from each participating University is presented below in Table 1.

Table 1 – Percentage of sample in each position type by participating University

  Uni A (N=421) Uni B (N=259) Uni C (N=159) Total (N=839)
  % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n)
Position type    
Academic 36.6 (154) 43.6 (113) 38.4  (61) 39.1 (328)
Administrative 59.4 (250) 51.4 (133) 57.2  (91) 56.5 (474)
Executive Level 4.0 (17) 5.0 (13) 4.4  (7) 4.4 (37)

The percentage of participants by position title is presented separately for academic and administrative staff in Table 2. Note: in this table, administrative staff includes executive level staff.

Table 2 – Percentage of academic and administrative staff by position title*

Academic Staff (N=328) Administrative Staff (N=511)
position title % (n) position title % (n)
Research Assistant 3.4 (11) Librarian 4.6 (23)
Research Officer 2.5 (8) Assistant 12.5 (63)
Associate Lecturer 4.7 (15) Officer 26.8 (135)
Research Fellow 3.8 (12) Coordinator or Supervisor 19.6 (99)
Lecturer 29.5 (94) Senior Coordinator 5.8 (29)
Senior Research Fellow 3.8 (12) Manager 23.4 (118)
Senior Lecturer 19.4 (62) Executive Level 7.3 (37)
Principal Research Fellow 0.9 (3)
Reader/Associate Professor 17.2 (55)
Professor 14.7 (47)

*Tallies do not add to total N because of missing data.

Data Analysis
Responses from the three participating Universities were combined for the analyses presented in this report (N=839). Regressions, T-tests, ANOVAs and Chi-Square statistical tests were used to test for significant differences between age groups (40 to 49 year olds; 50 to 59 year olds; and 60+ year olds), menstrual status groups (pre-menopausal; peri-menopausal; and post-menopausal) and position types (academic; and administrative/executive level). Differences in mean scale scores and differences in percentages are only reported in text if they are statistically significant at p<.05.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: